Tuesday, 11 March 2014

Blog Post 2: Evaluating Intercultural Communication

As a Singaporean born Australian revisiting Singapore as an exchange student, I've had the opportunity to both experience and observe countless scenarios involving intercultural communication. Specifically, I remember a situation from week two of semester which really illustrated the multidimensional nature of intercultural communication.

In the dining hall of my residential college, there was a large group of exchange students of various nationalities sitting and eating together. During conversation, a European exchange student commented about the lack of variety of food available on campus and how he was continually having to eat western food. He did not like rice or noodles and found that where ever he went, rice or noodle dishes were the only choices. I found his view rather skewed but kept these thoughts to myself as each individual has their own subjective viewpoint and tastes. However, there was an American student who strongly disagreed and responded bluntly with “I do not see how food is a problem at all. Singapore is such a culturally diverse place, there is so much great food everywhere and I find that I’ve been able to assimilate completely.”



Intercultural communication is becoming much more present and commonplace in our daily lives and society today. There are many aspects to culture and communication which can be similar, very different or even conflicting to our own! Several categorised differences can especially be noted between low vs. high context cultures, with non-verbal cues (proxemics, haptics, oculesics, kinesics), values (collectivist vs. individualistic, masculine vs feminine), time management (polychronic vs monochronic) and verbal communication styles (direct vs indirect, instrumental vs affective).

In this scenario the American student was very direct and instrumental in communicating her ideas, the European student did show slight offense however he didn’t extend the argument or take it personally. Different people communicate differently and although personally we may see their approaches as right or wrong, we need to understand that each individual’s own background teaches different norms, values and ways of communication. It is important not to have prejudice, stereotype or categorise people based on culture as each individual is unique.

Situations like this are probably familiar to many and to effectively communicate, we must be open, knowledgeable, understanding and instead embrace the differences between cultures.

Thursday, 6 February 2014

Blog Post 1: Resolving Interpersonal Conflict

Sarah and Lisa were colleagues who had been working together in the same department of a retail organisation. Sarah was a middle aged, loyal member of staff who had been in her role for almost 20 years and Lisa was a young, entry level salesperson who had been with the company for just over a year. Susan was known to have a strong, brash personality towards all staff, supposedly a by product of working in the same job and industry. In her long standing position, several people had been unable to cope with the demands and clashes of trivial conflict with Sarah and had even requested for transfers to other departments. 

Over the course of the year, Lisa had grown accustomed to conduct of the department and established a sense of comfort within the working environment.  She also developed a relatively friendly relationship with Sarah and the other staff. However, one day Sarah commented something in passing that deeply upset and offended Lisa. She broke down in tears in the staff bathroom where several colleagues offered her words of consolation. When she returned to her department, she stopped conversing entirely with Sarah, except for necessary work related talk.  As this was not the first time Sarah had affronted a fellow colleague, Lisa approached a manager about her specific issue and they provided her with a choice to change department.

Although realising Lisa’s change of behaviour and demeanour, Sarah was only made aware of the effects of her comment through other colleagues. Unwilling to address the issue, both women continued to avoid each other and as consequence, much tension and rigidity was felt in the department environment.

How can the other colleagues approach this situation in order to restore the working environment?